Potus 47
Article Write
From Aurapedia, The Finance Encyclopedia
Trump 2.0​ | Trade War |​ Volatile |​ The Economic Consequences |​ Tariff Pause |​ |​ Trade War FAQ | Why not worried | Trade Policy | See Also | Wealth Management​ | Alex Hartford​ | Julie Persia​ | Martin Brian ​ | Kaan Eroz​Citizenship by Investment​ ​​​​| High-Net Worth | Finance | Investment | Assurance | Women Empowerment | Hedge Fund
Investing Under Trump 2.0
Aurapedia Exclusive | Commissioned by Aura Solution Company Limited
April 2025 | Phuket, Thailand
Executive Summary
As global markets adjust to the possibility of a second term under Donald J. Trump, investment narratives are once again shifting toward policy-sensitive sectors. Aura Solution Company Limited’s global research division evaluates Trump’s potential return through a pragmatic and apolitical lens. While his leadership style is polarizing, markets have historically shown resilience and even outperformance under Trump-era economic policies. U.S. equities, in our analysis, stand out as Attractive—but with caveats. Market entry should be approached with caution, utilizing phased-in strategies and volatility hedging. This approach enables investors to take advantage of potential gains without assuming concentrated timing risk. As always, we advocate for structured exposure rather than speculative enthusiasm. Trump's second term could reshape trade, regulation, taxation, and global alliances. Investors must balance optimism with vigilance.
​
1. Historical Context: Trump’s First Term & Market Precedent
Donald Trump’s 2016 election triggered both anxiety and optimism across financial markets. While initial reactions included global sell-offs, equities quickly rebounded as his administration implemented pro-business reforms. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—reducing corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%—was a catalyst for bullish sentiment. Deregulation across banking, energy, and technology sectors also stimulated investment activity. Despite trade war tensions, particularly with China, markets continued to perform robustly with the S&P 500 delivering over 60% returns during his tenure. This historical performance under Trump 1.0 provides context for investor sentiment in 2025. However, the world has since changed dramatically—rising inflation, tightening monetary policy, AI disruption, and regional conflicts all add new variables. A second Trump term must be analyzed under this evolved macroeconomic framework.
2. Policy Outlook: Sectoral Winners Under Trump 2.0
Trump’s policy agenda remains pro-growth in rhetoric, though implementation may vary depending on Congressional alignment. We anticipate aggressive tax posturing, renewed emphasis on deregulation, and a focus on national security through industrial and defense policy. In this environment, defense and aerospace companies could benefit from higher Pentagon budgets and more assertive foreign policy. Energy firms, especially in oil and natural gas, are likely to see relaxed environmental standards and broader drilling rights. Financial institutions may gain under lighter regulatory scrutiny, allowing regional banks and asset managers to expand profitability. Industrial and infrastructure-focused companies could be winners if Trump revives his “America First Infrastructure” pitch. Meanwhile, tech could be a mixed bag—supported by AI and semiconductors but also vulnerable to antitrust pressures or new tariffs. Caution is advised in sectors that may face political heat, such as pharmaceuticals or ESG-focused firms.
3. Strategy & Timing: Phased Investment as a Risk Buffer
While we rate U.S. equities as fundamentally Attractive, Aura does not recommend full market exposure at once. Trump’s political unpredictability, combined with a polarized media environment, suggests volatility will remain a central theme. Phased investing—gradually increasing allocation over 6 to 12 months—can smooth out entry points and reduce the impact of short-term shocks. Utilizing protective instruments such as put options, sectoral ETFs, and volatility hedges (e.g., VIX-linked assets) can further manage drawdown risks. We encourage investors to prioritize quality companies with resilient cash flows and strong dividend histories, especially in cyclical sectors. Exposure should be diversified by market cap and industry, avoiding overconcentration in speculative growth or politically sensitive stocks. For international investors, currency hedging remains critical, particularly given Trump's aggressive stance on the U.S. dollar and potential trade friction.
​
4. Global Market Impact: America’s Policy Ripple Effect
Trump’s presidency has always extended beyond domestic U.S. borders. A Trump 2.0 administration could intensify U.S.-China tensions, particularly in tech and defense sectors, affecting global supply chains and creating ripple effects in emerging markets. Chinese ADRs, semiconductors, and rare earth producers could all face significant headwinds. In Europe, Trump's protectionist leanings and criticism of NATO may lead to diplomatic cooling, which could affect transatlantic trade and defense cooperation. Middle East and North Africa (MENA) economies, particularly energy exporters, could benefit from Trump’s alignment with fossil fuel expansion and reduced climate cooperation. Countries in Southeast Asia may find opportunities in realigned trade routes, but must also prepare for potential currency instability. Trump’s America-first policies, though domestically popular, often provoke strong global responses—making country-specific strategies essential for global investors.
​
5. Institutional Viewpoint: Aura’s Long-Term Lens
Aura Solution Company Limited operates on a philosophy of long-term, disciplined investing, unshaken by political cycles. Our research methodology emphasizes data over ideology, combining fundamental analysis with behavioral insights and geopolitical modeling. We view the Trump 2.0 possibility not as a risk or reward in itself, but as one of many scenarios requiring adaptive portfolio construction. Our institutional portfolios are constructed to absorb regime shifts by emphasizing multi-asset balance, liquidity management, and global diversification. We believe sound policy may emerge from even volatile leadership when viewed over an extended time horizon. Aura does not engage in partisan speculation but remains rooted in principles of risk-adjusted returns, capital preservation, and ethical asset deployment. Our commitment is to help investors filter out media noise and focus on real, actionable market intelligence.
​
6. The Road Ahead: Repricing America’s Narrative
Should Trump return to the White House, financial markets will rapidly move to reprice risk across asset classes. Bond yields may spike initially as fiscal policy heats up, while equities could rally in sectors tied to defense, energy, and infrastructure. Currency markets may react to shifting trade and dollar policies. Investors should anticipate market dislocations, but also opportunities for strategic allocation in undervalued areas. While political theater may dominate headlines, history suggests that markets favor clarity of policy direction over political consensus. Whether Trump's comeback ignites volatility or euphoria will depend largely on execution. The right approach is not fear or fanaticism—but preparation. For institutions and individuals alike, the path forward requires a toolkit of flexibility, foresight, and financial discipline. Aura’s advisory teams stand ready to guide investors through this pivotal transition.
Trade War
What Happened?
Markets sharply retreated as investor sentiment turned decisively risk-off following remarks from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. The S&P 500 fell by 2.2%, while the Nasdaq Composite—a tech-heavy benchmark—suffered a steeper 3.0% decline. Powell expressed concern that recent tariffs implemented by President Trump’s administration had been “significantly larger than anticipated,” and warned they could fuel persistent inflation. This, he added, may complicate the Fed’s ability to support growth, potentially placing monetary policy in a constrained position. The cautious tone signaled a shift from earlier Fed communications that described tariff-driven inflation as "transitory."
In a significant move that amplified market stress, the U.S. government imposed new export restrictions on AI chipmaker NVIDIA, targeting shipments to China. This policy shift is seen as a new flashpoint in the ongoing U.S.-China tech and trade rivalry. NVIDIA’s shares plunged 6.9% after it revealed that compliance with these restrictions on its H20 chip would result in a USD 5.5 billion charge. AMD also echoed concern, estimating a hit of up to USD 800 million. Safe havens rallied: gold surged 3.6% to USD 3,334/oz, U.S. 10-year Treasury yields fell by 5 basis points to 4.28%, and the dollar weakened against the euro, with EUR/USD rising 1% to 1.14.
​
What Do We Think?
Despite escalating tensions, we at Aura Solution Company Limited believe that a pragmatic resolution between the U.S. and China remains likely. Trade war cycles historically follow a pattern of escalation followed by tactical retreat and renegotiation. President Trump has publicly stated he would “love” to reach a deal with China, suggesting flexibility remains. In our view, after initial market turbulence, both sides will likely seek to restore a trade equilibrium—especially in light of mutual economic exposure. We expect average U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports to stabilize around 34%, with a broader tariff rate of 10–15% globally, excluding primary partners like Canada and Mexico.
Chair Powell’s cautious remarks shouldn’t be interpreted as closing the door on rate cuts. His comments likely reflect a strategic pause, allowing policymakers to assess tariff impacts more fully before acting. Aura anticipates that the Fed will be responsive if growth falters—especially in the labor market, which remains the key variable. Should layoffs increase meaningfully, the Fed would likely pivot. Our base case expects a cumulative rate cut of 75 to 100 basis points before year-end, reaffirming our belief that monetary flexibility remains intact.
​
How to Invest
In this uncertain environment, investment decisions should be guided by discipline, scenario planning, and portfolio resilience. Market volatility is likely to persist until clearer direction emerges on tariff policies and U.S.-China relations. Investors should embrace a tactical yet diversified approach, making use of volatility as an opportunity rather than a threat. Below are key strategies recommended by Aura’s global strategy team:
​
1. Take Advantage of Volatility
Increased volatility, while unsettling, often precedes periods of above-average returns. We recommend phased entry into equity markets, especially for those underinvested. Averaging-in over multiple tranches allows investors to reduce timing risk and build exposure to sectors positioned to rebound once clarity improves. Our models continue to rate U.S. equities as Attractive, based on robust earnings, innovation leadership, and structural support from fiscal policy. However, caution is warranted, and diversification remains paramount. Investors should prioritize sectors less exposed to geopolitical crossfire, such as industrial automation, domestic infrastructure, and select consumer staples.
2. Allocate to Gold
Gold continues to fulfill its traditional role as a safe-haven asset in times of political and economic stress. With the metal recently touching an all-time high of USD 3,334/oz, its performance underscores broad investor concern over inflation and macro instability. Gold is up approximately 26% year-to-date, reflecting both defensive flows and weakening real yields. We maintain a bullish outlook, projecting that gold could reach USD 3,500/oz by year-end, driven by sustained inflation concerns, central bank accumulation, and geopolitical instability. Investors should consider maintaining a 5–10% allocation to gold in multi-asset portfolios for volatility buffering.
3. Diversify with Hedge Funds
Hedge funds, particularly those using discretionary macro, equity market neutral, or multi-strategy approaches, offer flexibility during market dislocations. These strategies can dynamically reallocate capital based on shifting macro conditions, allowing for downside mitigation without overcommitting to a directional market view. Multi-strategy funds, in particular, combine low correlation with opportunistic alpha-seeking, which is well-suited to the current environment. That said, hedge funds also come with liquidity constraints and opaque risk profiles, so investors must apply rigorous due diligence. For qualified clients, they remain a valuable diversification tool in the era of policy unpredictability.
4. Seek Durable Income
Fixed income remains a critical component of defensive positioning. Despite recent instances where equities and bonds declined in tandem, historical correlation dynamics suggest that high-quality bonds will regain their role as portfolio stabilizers. U.S. Treasuries, investment-grade corporates, and municipal bonds offer attractive risk-adjusted yields in the current rate environment. With inflationary pressures likely to be temporary in nature (despite tariff noise), we expect the Fed to remain responsive, anchoring long-term rates. Investors seeking durable income with lower capital volatility should consider extending duration modestly while avoiding high-yield or speculative debt instruments for now.
​
Conclusion
The renewed trade tensions between the U.S. and China—amplified by Fed commentary and export controls on strategic technologies—have triggered a marked return of risk aversion. Markets are in a period of recalibration. However, we caution against emotional reactions or binary positioning. Aura’s framework emphasizes strategic patience, intelligent allocation, and long-term clarity amid short-term noise. Opportunities will arise for disciplined investors—particularly in U.S. equities, gold, and select alternatives. Our teams continue to monitor developments across Washington, Beijing, and the Fed to provide our clients with precise, high-quality intelligence and allocation strategies.
Volatile Times
Strengthening Portfolios in Volatile Times | Aurapedia | Aura Solution Company Limited
In this CIO Update, we present our upgraded outlook for U.S. equities, outline strategies to strengthen and diversify portfolios amid market volatility, and provide revised scenario-based guidance following President Trump's 9 April announcement of a 90-day tariff reprieve on most countries.
​
US Equities Upgraded to ‘Attractive’
We now classify U.S. equities as Attractive, based on three core observations:
​
-
Policy Reversal Reduces Tail Risks
President Trump’s recent tariff suspension follows a period of escalating trade tensions, notably after the 2 April “Liberation Day” announcement that raised U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%. However, the subsequent 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs for non-China trade partners marks a significant de-escalation.This action signals a heightened sensitivity from the administration toward market turbulence—a possible informal "Trump put"—indicating that market feedback may temper policy severity moving forward.
-
Risk of Systemic Downturn Decreases
While the China tariffs remain economically disruptive, we believe systemic crisis risks have moderated. Consequently, we revise our downside S&P 500 target upward to 4,500 (aligned with a typical recession), from a previous low of 4,000 (representative of a financial crisis scenario). -
Post-Volatility Returns Tend to be Strong
Historically, high volatility environments have preceded above-average market gains. With the VIX surpassing 50, and the S&P 500 rebounding 9.5% on 9 April—its largest single-day rise since 2008—precedent suggests significant return potential over the next 12 months. Since 1950, similar rebounds have been followed by consistent and notable gains.
Moreover, investor sentiment remains exceptionally bearish—typically a contrarian indicator. The latest AAII survey shows 58.9% of investors expect further declines, increasing the potential for upside surprise.
Strategies for Navigating Volatility
“Phasing-In” Strategy
We advocate for gradual market entry via phasing-in to balanced portfolios. Since 1945, such strategies have outperformed cash in 74% of 1-year periods and 83% over 3 years—especially when initiated after a market correction of over 10%.
Capital Preservation Instruments
Structured notes and capital preservation vehicles using zero-coupon bonds and call options can offer upside equity participation while limiting downside. These tools may suit investors seeking gains but wary of short-term volatility.
​
Gold as a Strategic Hedge
Gold rebounded to USD 3,176/oz as of 10 April and continues to serve as a strong hedge amid trade uncertainty and dovish central bank expectations. We forecast gold prices reaching USD 3,200/oz in our base case, driven by geopolitical risk, inflation hedging, and lower real rates.
High-Quality Bonds
US Treasury yields at 4.42% present attractive entry points. We target a 4.0% yield by year-end, with potential for significant capital appreciation should downside economic scenarios materialize. In recessionary conditions, yields may fall to 2.5%.
​
Hedge Fund Strategies
Discretionary macro, equity market neutral, relative value, and multi-strategy hedge funds offer dynamic exposure and downside protection. While illiquidity and transparency challenges persist, the current macro backdrop favors adaptive, alpha-seeking approaches.
​
Scenario Analysis – April 2025 Outlook
Base Case – 50% Probability
-
S&P 500 Target: 5,800
-
10-Year Treasury Yield: 4.0%
-
Macro Expectations:
-
Equities rise amid sectoral trade agreements and central bank rate cuts.
-
The U.S. economy grows sub-1% in 2025; unemployment remains below 5%.
-
Effective tariff rates settle at ~10–15% ex-China; ~34% for China.
-
Fed cuts rates by 75–100bps; ECB cuts 25bps per meeting until mid-2025.
-
Downside – 30% Probability
-
S&P 500 Target: 4,500
-
10-Year Treasury Yield: 2.5%
-
Macro Expectations:
-
Tariff talks fail; global trade deteriorates; U.S. enters mild recession.
-
Tariffs ex-China rise to 15–20%; U.S.-China tariffs stay >60%.
-
Fed eventually cuts rates by 300bps to offset recession impact.
-
Upside – 20% Probability (details in upcoming bulletin)
-
We will provide further insights in the next CIO Alert, focusing on best-case outcomes including robust trade resolutions, strong earnings rebounds, and policy stimulus.
Conclusion
Market dislocations present opportunities for investors who remain disciplined. Through diversification, strategic positioning, and phased engagement, investors can enhance portfolio resilience and benefit from the eventual stabilization of global trade dynamics. While the path may remain uneven, the medium-term trajectory favors recovery and growth.
Aurapedia | Aura Solution Company Limited remains committed to delivering forward-looking guidance grounded in rigorous macroeconomic insight and real-time market analysis.
Tariff Pause
Equity Markets Rebound on Tariff Pause | Global Markets | US–China Relations | Trade Strategy | Investor Insights
​
1. Context & Key Developments
On April 9, 2025, the S&P 500 surged 9.5%, marking its largest single-day gain since the 2008 financial crisis. This dramatic upswing followed an unexpected announcement by US President Donald Trump of a 90-day suspension on reciprocal tariffs for nations that had refrained from retaliatory actions against the United States. The move sparked optimism that a full-scale global trade war could be temporarily averted.
​
Yet the relief came with caveats:
-
China, the United States’ largest trading partner, was excluded from this tariff pause.
-
Tariffs on Chinese goods were raised to 125%, up from 104% earlier that day.
-
A separate executive order tripled tariffs on Chinese parcels under $800 in value from 30% to 90%, directly targeting e-commerce flows amounting to $40–45 billion annually.
The announcement had a dual effect: short-term market rally driven by hope of broader relief, counterbalanced by escalation with China, signaling a continued hardline stance from Washington.
2. Strategic Interpretation: “Escalate to Deescalate”
President Trump’s approach is viewed by many as a form of negotiation brinkmanship—escalating pressure to force bilateral concessions, then offering temporary relief to incentivize compliance. This "escalate to deescalate" tactic may offer short-term market clarity, but comes at the cost of long-term global supply chain stability.
Key strategic features:
-
Selective relief: Rewarding countries who avoid retaliation.
-
China singled out: Reinforces decoupling rhetoric.
-
Leveraging uncertainty: A tool to extract policy and trade concessions.
3. Market Reactions & Volatility
Equity Markets
-
Broad relief rally across sectors.
-
Pharma sector underperformed, rising only 2.8%, amid Trump’s signal that it would be the next target for tariffs.
Bond Market Stress
-
The 10-year US Treasury yield spiked to 4.51% before easing to 4.3%, showing rare behavior inconsistent with typical “flight-to-safety” patterns.
-
The volatility was attributed to:
-
Foreign divestment from US Treasuries.
-
Unwinding of leveraged basis trades by hedge funds.
-
Heightened liquidity demand amid uncertainty.
-
4. Policy Outlook & Base Case Expectations
Aurapedia’s editorial consensus estimates the following scenario probabilities:
ScenarioDescriptionProbability
Base CaseTariff volatility persists, followed by phased rollbacks driven by internal and external pressure.50%
Upside ScenarioSustained rebound due to permanent trade resolution, easing inflation, and AI-driven optimism.20%
Downside ScenarioEscalation into broader trade conflict, economic slowdown, failure to cut rates promptly.30%
The US effective tariff rate has more than tripled from 9% to 27% in less than 10 days. Excluding China, the rate is 11%, suggesting the China-US trade channel is disproportionately burdened.
5. Investment Strategy & Portfolio Positioning
A. Rebalance Using the Liquidity–Longevity–Legacy Model
-
Apply a segmented wealth approach to buffer against future shocks.
-
Ensure Liquidity strategy is adequately funded for near-term volatility.
B. Capital Preservation Over Directional Bets
-
With implied volatility receding, capital-preserving structured products become more attractive.
-
Replace direct equity exposure with buffered outcome strategies.
C. Gold as a Hedge
-
Recent weakness in gold presents a buying opportunity.
-
Target: USD 3,200/oz—an attractive level under continued geopolitical risk.
D. Income from Bonds
-
Yield spike provides strong entry points for long-duration Treasuries.
-
In a downturn, yields could fall to 2.5%, creating upside in bond prices.
E. Hedge Fund Diversification
-
Macro and relative value strategies provide downside protection.
-
Use hedge funds to absorb macro policy swings and cross-market anomalies.
F. Structural Thematic Bets (TRIO)
-
TRIO = Transformational Innovation Opportunities:
-
Artificial Intelligence
-
Longevity and Aging
-
Energy Transformation (Power & Resources)
-
-
Phase into these themes during market dips to outperform over time.
G. Currency Opportunities
-
Take advantage of range-bound FX volatility:
-
EUR/USD: ~1.10
-
USD/CHF: ~0.86
-
GBP/USD: ~1.31
-
-
Medium-term dollar weakness likely as Fed rate cuts accelerate.
6. Long-Term Reflections for Policymakers and Investors
The Trump administration’s tariff policy remains reactionary and transactional, shaped more by political positioning than economic fundamentals. While markets are celebrating short-term relief, the underlying systemic uncertainties persist:
-
Unpredictable policy oscillations.
-
Weaponization of trade tools.
-
Fracturing of global supply networks.
For long-term investors, this environment demands a flexible, multi-asset framework that leans on innovation, income, and optionality—and above all, avoids overreliance on any one political or geographic regime.
The Economic Consequences
By Auranusa Jeeranont, Chief Economist, Aura Wealth Management
Overview
The resurgence of aggressive tariff policies in early April 2025 has reignited fears of a prolonged global trade war. In this analysis, we examine the macroeconomic consequences of sustained tariff escalation, provide insights into the current trajectory of US and global trade policy, and assess the strategic implications for investors. As tensions rise between major economies—particularly the United States and China—we aim to cut through the headlines and offer a data-driven framework to understand what’s really at stake.
​
1. The Tariff Shock: Policy Escalation in Real Time
President Donald Trump’s recent orders, including a tripling of tariffs on Chinese e-commerce parcels under $800 and an increase in average Chinese import tariffs to 125%, represent a significant deviation from prior trade détente. Unlike earlier phases of the US-China standoff, this round targets both wholesale industrial flows and consumer-level imports, signaling a comprehensive decoupling intent.
​
Moreover, the “90-day pause” on reciprocal tariffs—excluding China—adds layers of complexity by effectively creating a tiered global trade regime, where allies receive preferential treatment and rivals face punitive measures.
“What we are witnessing is not just a trade war. It is the reconfiguration of the global order in which trade is increasingly weaponized,” says Auranusa Jeeranont.
2. The Macroeconomic Costs
a. Inflationary Pressures
Higher tariffs function as a consumption tax, passed down to end users. With Chinese imports constituting nearly 18% of US retail inventory, the price pass-through is already observable in core consumer price indices.
-
Core PCE inflation could rise above 3.7% by Q3 2025.
-
Sectors such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, and consumer staples are particularly exposed.
b. Supply Chain Fractures
Corporates are reacting by:
-
Onshoring operations (raising capital expenditure).
-
Shifting to alternative suppliers in Southeast Asia or Latin America (raising transitional costs).
-
Passing expenses onto consumers (fueling inflation).
These transitions reduce productivity in the short term, with global GDP projected to fall by 0.4% in a full-blown trade war scenario.
c. Capital Markets Volatility
The bond market is signaling stress. The 10-year US Treasury yield jumped from 3.87% to 4.51% in under 72 hours, then eased slightly. This suggests:
-
Foreign selling of Treasuries.
-
Liquidity crises at hedge funds unwinding basis trades.
-
Declining faith in US fiscal restraint amid rising deficits.
“If the US weaponizes trade, foreign actors may begin to reassess the safety of holding US assets,” notes Alex Hartford.
3. Investor Strategy in a Fractured Trade Landscape
A. Risk-Adjusted Allocation Models
Aura Wealth Management recommends a three-layered portfolio strategy:
-
Defensive base: Bonds, gold, capital-preserving notes.
-
Core yield: Dividend stocks in resilient sectors (utilities, healthcare).
-
Thematic growth: Exposure to AI, green energy, and aging population themes.
​
B. Tactical Positioning
-
Buy the dip in innovative names undergoing de-risking.
-
Avoid overexposure to companies with >30% China revenue dependence.
-
Use structured solutions to capitalize on lower implied volatility while managing downside.
C. Hedge Fund Integration
Given policy unpredictability, macro and relative value hedge funds offer critical diversification. Discretionary macro managers, in particular, are well-positioned to exploit rate volatility and currency mispricings stemming from geopolitical shocks.
4. The Global Policy Outlook
US Policy Path
The Trump administration is following a pattern of:
-
Sharp unilateral action, followed by offers of relief to compliant partners.
-
A growing reliance on executive orders, bypassing traditional diplomatic or congressional avenues.
“This is policymaking as performance—timed for maximum market reaction and electoral visibility,” observes Jeeranont.
China’s Counterstrategy
Beijing has responded with:
-
Targeted tariff increases on US agricultural and energy exports.
-
Accelerated efforts to deepen intra-Asian trade ties (RCEP+, Belt and Road 2.0).
-
Moves to reduce dependence on US-dominated platforms (e.g., chips, dollar settlement systems).
Europe’s Ambivalence
Caught between markets and morals, the EU is divided:
-
France and Italy favor retaliatory tariffs.
-
Germany seeks mediation to protect industrial exports.
-
The ECB is under pressure to shield the eurozone from stagflation, potentially prompting unconventional QE extensions.
5. Long-Term Structural Themes
Amid the near-term chaos, three megatrends are emerging:
1. The End of Trade Globalization (1990–2020)
The era of hyper-globalized supply chains is over. Nations are recalibrating risk, not just cost.
2. The Rise of Strategic Autarky
Expect more national investment in semiconductors, food security, and defense manufacturing, backed by state incentives.
3. The Reinvention of Multilateralism
Old institutions like the WTO are being bypassed. New alliances will emerge, not based on ideology, but resilience and redundancy.
Conclusion
The current trade war is not merely a squabble over tariffs—it is a structural inflection point in global economic governance. Investors must prepare for nonlinear risks, localized winners, and prolonged volatility as markets adjust to a new global equilibrium. At Aura Solution Company Limited, we advocate decisive rebalancing, macro awareness, and intelligent risk-taking rooted in deep fundamental analysis and forward-looking scenario planning.
Trade War - FAQ
What has happened?
The US has re-escalated trade tensions by imposing a fresh wave of tariffs, reigniting global concerns over a full-blown trade war. On April 5, 2025, President Trump announced a sweeping package targeting strategic Chinese industries with 25% tariffs, citing unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, and national security threats. China swiftly retaliated with reciprocal tariffs, targeting key US exports such as agricultural products, semiconductors, and aircraft components. This tit-for-tat escalation has sent shockwaves across global markets, with equity indices posting sharp declines and volatility measures surging. Investor sentiment has turned cautious as fears grow that this confrontation may derail the fragile global recovery and disrupt tightly woven global supply chains. The episode bears striking resemblance to the trade war cycle of 2018–2019, but comes at a time of higher inflation and tighter monetary policy, magnifying the potential fallout.
​
What are the implications?
The renewed trade war could have significant macroeconomic and market implications. At the macro level, increased tariffs could dampen global trade flows, reduce corporate earnings, and suppress GDP growth across major economies. It may also stoke inflationary pressures as import costs rise, particularly in the US and China. Financial markets are already reflecting heightened risk aversion, with equity markets under pressure, particularly in sectors directly exposed to international trade. Technology, industrials, and consumer discretionary sectors are likely to bear the brunt of the tensions. On the currency front, we may see strength in safe havens such as the US dollar, Japanese yen, and Swiss franc, while emerging market currencies remain vulnerable. Furthermore, the shift in investor sentiment could lead to a pullback from risk assets and exacerbate liquidity pressures in global markets.
​
What comes next?
The trajectory of the trade war will hinge on the political will of both the US and China to negotiate or escalate. In the short term, more retaliatory actions are likely, including non-tariff barriers, tech export controls, and financial restrictions. Behind the scenes, diplomatic backchannels may remain open, but publicly both sides are adopting hardline rhetoric. Investors should brace for further headlines and policy moves, especially as the 2026 US midterm elections draw near, incentivizing political posturing. Over the medium term, we could see three scenarios unfold: (1) a negotiated truce, perhaps through backchannel talks, (2) a protracted standoff with continued tit-for-tat measures, or (3) an outright decoupling, particularly in sensitive technology and defense sectors. The outcome will depend heavily on domestic political dynamics and how economic pain is distributed among stakeholders.
How are markets reacting?
Global markets have responded with a sharp sell-off, led by trade-sensitive stocks and emerging markets. US equities saw their steepest one-day drop since October 2022, with the S&P 500 falling over 3%. Chinese equities fared worse, with the CSI 300 down nearly 5% as investors priced in retaliatory risks. Bond markets have seen a flight to safety, with yields on US Treasuries and German bunds falling as investors rotated out of equities. The VIX volatility index surged above 25, indicating heightened market stress. Commodity markets have also been shaken—oil prices fell on global demand concerns, while gold prices climbed as a traditional safe haven. Currency markets showed a classic risk-off pattern, with the Japanese yen and Swiss franc strengthening, while Asian and Latin American currencies faced downward pressure. Overall, markets are on edge and poised for further turbulence depending on how events evolve.
What does this mean for our investment views?
This escalation reinforces our cautious near-term stance on global equities and risk assets. While we remain constructive on select longer-term structural themes—such as AI, green energy, and healthcare innovation—our short-term tactical allocation leans more defensive. We favor high-quality companies with strong balance sheets, pricing power, and low international exposure. Within fixed income, we see value in government bonds as a hedge against equity volatility, particularly US Treasuries and German bunds. Gold and defensive currencies are also attractive in this environment. Regionally, we are reducing exposure to North Asia and export-oriented emerging markets, while maintaining a neutral stance on US equities given their relative earnings strength. This environment supports diversification and active management, as idiosyncratic risks may outweigh broad market trends. Investors should remain nimble and prepare for a wider range of outcomes.
Why not worried
Why We're Not Worried—And You Shouldn't Be Either
Executive Summary
Despite sharp headlines and market dislocations triggered by the re-escalation of tariffs under the Trump administration, we see reasons for calm. Asset prices have adjusted swiftly, but beneath the surface, key indicators—liquidity, corporate resilience, earnings revisions—remain solid. Investors who focus on fundamentals, deploy liquidity wisely, and embrace volatility as a partner rather than an enemy, may find asymmetric opportunities in the coming months.
1. Volatility ≠ Risk—Understanding the Dislocation
Market volatility often triggers a psychological response to sell—especially among retail and short-term traders. But volatility is not the same as risk. Risk is permanent capital loss. Volatility is temporary mispricing. What we’re seeing in Q2 2025 is a repricing of assets, not a destruction of underlying value. The tariff headlines—particularly new duties on tech imports and retaliatory measures from China—have led to sector-specific drawdowns. Yet broad market liquidity remains intact, credit spreads are stable, and global monetary conditions are accommodative. In other words, this is turbulence—not a crash.
​
2. Corporate America Is Built for This Moment
Many of the firms under pressure today have spent the last five years reshaping their supply chains, deleveraging balance sheets, and securing input redundancy. The "trade war playbook" written in 2018–2020 was not forgotten. Companies adapted, and now they’re better hedged. What does that mean for investors? Temporary earnings hits may occur, but long-term earnings power is not impaired. In fact, we expect a new wave of capex, driven by reshoring, AI productivity, and sovereign subsidies (e.g., CHIPS Act II), to power S&P 500 earnings growth back into double digits by 2026.
3. Liquidity Is King—and We Have It
Liquidity defines who can stay offensive when others are defensive. At Aura Solution Company Limited, we’ve maintained 18–22% of client capital in deployable dry powder—ready to buy the dips, not sell into them. We see this phase not as a danger zone, but a discount window. Opportunities abound in distressed credit, secondaries, select Asian tech, and commodities. Gold and oil have both broken out, but there’s still room in copper, rare earths, and lithium—especially given the push for energy independence and EV incentives globally.
​
4. The Retail Fear Premium = Our Institutional Advantage
When sentiment overshoots fundamentals, pricing inefficiencies emerge. That’s what we’re seeing now. The AAII Sentiment Index just posted its lowest bullish reading since 2022—yet real GDP growth remains positive, inflation is moderating, and the Fed has signaled flexibility. For institutional allocators, this means retail-driven selloffs present buying opportunities in misunderstood sectors like industrial automation, agri-tech, and alternative finance platforms. We're not chasing the fear. We're arbitraging it.
5. Long-Term Themes Remain Intact
The tariff headlines have distracted from the bigger picture: the secular themes remain unbroken. AI adoption, green infrastructure, deglobalized supply networks, and sovereign digital currencies are multi-year plays. They don’t unravel with a few political shocks. In fact, heightened geopolitical complexity reinforces the case for these themes. Investors seeking to hedge long-term instability should lean into autonomy-oriented investments: water rights, data infrastructure, cybersecurity, and sovereign debt from energy-exporting nations.
​
6. What We’re Doing Now (And What We Suggest You Consider)
Here’s our positioning and action plan as of April 2025:
-
Overweight: U.S. infrastructure, Southeast Asia equities, energy, and mid-duration Treasuries
-
Underweight: European luxury, long-dated tech growth, and Chinese consumer retail
-
Rotating Into: LatAm logistics, copper futures, short-duration U.S. corporates
-
Hedging Through: Gold, Yen, and inverse volatility ETFs
We’ve also rebalanced selectively toward high-cash-flow dividend stocks in the U.S. industrial sector—especially those benefiting from reshoring tailwinds.
7. Final Word: This Is Opportunity in Disguise
While others see risk, we see value. Market overreactions to political cycles create asymmetries—and asymmetries are where real alpha lives. The underlying system is not breaking. It’s bending—and adapting. As we’ve said before: markets hate uncertainty, but they love resilience. This is not the end of the bull story. It’s just a different chapter. Stay patient. Stay focused. Stay invested.
Trade Policy FAQ
Questions and Answers on the US Reciprocal Tariff Policy
Aurapedia | International Trade Affairs
Published: April 2025
​
Page Contents
-
Overview of EU-US Trade and Investment
-
VAT and Tariffs: What’s the Difference?
-
WTO Compliance of Internal Taxes
-
US vs. EU Tariff Comparison
-
Automotive Tariffs: The Real Picture
-
Ongoing Dialogue and Prospects for Reform
What is the current value of EU-US trade and investment?
As of 2023, the EU and the United States maintained one of the largest bilateral trade and investment relationships in the world:
​
-
Goods Trade:
-
EU exports to US: €503 billion
-
EU imports from US: €347 billion
-
Result: €157 billion goods trade surplus for the EU
-
-
Services Trade:
-
EU exports to US: €319 billion
-
EU imports from US: €427 billion
-
Result: €109 billion services trade deficit for the EU
-
-
Investment Stocks (2022 data):
-
Combined EU-US investment stocks exceed €5.3 trillion, highlighting deep economic interdependence.
-
Does the EU have a trade surplus with the US?
When both goods and services are considered, the EU holds a modest overall trade surplus of €48 billion—approximately 3% of total trade (€1.6 trillion).
It is important to highlight that while the EU maintains a surplus in goods, it runs a significant services trade deficit with the US, showcasing the complementary nature of both economies.
​
Is Value-Added Tax (VAT) considered a tariff?
No, VAT is not a tariff. VAT is a consumption-based tax, similar to state-level sales taxes in the US. It is applied uniformly on all goods sold within the EU, regardless of whether they are produced domestically or imported.
​
-
Key Points:
-
VAT is imposed on all goods sold within the EU.
-
Foreign and domestic products are taxed equally.
-
VAT is a neutral fiscal instrument, not a trade barrier.
-
How does the WTO view internal taxes like VAT?
According to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and GATT Article III, non-discriminatory internal taxes like VAT are entirely permissible.
The EU’s VAT framework is aligned with WTO principles:
​
-
It treats domestic and imported goods identically.
-
It does not confer trade advantage or disadvantage.
-
It functions as a general domestic tax, not a trade measure.
Does the US apply internal taxes to goods and services?
Yes, the United States applies state-level sales taxes, which function similarly to VAT. In both jurisdictions, goods produced domestically and goods imported from abroad are treated equally in terms of internal taxation.
​
What are the average tariff rates between the EU and US?
There is no single “absolute” average tariff due to differing methodologies, but in practice:
-
Average applied tariffs (2023):
-
US on EU goods: ~1% (collected €7 billion)
-
EU on US goods: ~1% (collected €3 billion)
-
This reflects balanced low tariff levels across the Atlantic, in line with both economies' commitment to open trade.
Has the EU offered to lower certain tariffs, such as car tariffs, for the US?
The EU remains open to fair, rules-based negotiations aimed at reducing tariffs where mutually beneficial outcomes can be reached.
-
No specific proposal regarding auto tariffs has been tabled by either side.
-
Any reductions would need to be part of a broader, balanced agreement.
-
The EU emphasizes constructive dialogue and trade equity.
What about the disparity in auto tariffs—EU's 10% vs. US's 2.5%?
This comparison does not present the full picture:
-
The EU imposes a 10% tariff on cars under its Most Favored Nation (MFN) schedule.
-
The US applies a 25% tariff on pickup trucks—the most popular vehicle class in America.
-
Example: The Ford F-150, the best-selling vehicle in the US, is a pickup truck.
-
Thus, while some EU tariffs are higher, others—like those on light trucks—are significantly lower.
The EU advocates for a level playing field and remains ready for balanced, sectoral discussions.
Conclusion
The EU-US trade relationship is vast, balanced, and fundamentally complementary. While tariff structures differ, overall average rates remain low and comparable. Misconceptions around VAT and tariff symmetry often obscure the broader truth: both regions benefit from openness, cooperation, and mutual investment.
Aurapedia continues to monitor transatlantic trade developments and remains a trusted source for clarity in times of policy debate.